• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • °ÔÀÓ¼³°è | Cases and Studies of Game Design in Lottery & Gambling | êý戏设计

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 1778
    Article] Neural Representation of Reward Probability: Evidence from the Illusion of Control
    DocNo of ILP: 647

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: Neural Representation of Reward Probability: Evidence from the Illusion of Control

    Authors: Kool, W; Getz, SJ; Botvinick, MM

    Full Name of Authors: Kool, Wouter; Getz, Sarah J.; Botvinick, Matthew M.

    Keywords by Author:

    Keywords Plus: PROSPECT-THEORY; BEHAVIORAL-CONTROL; CINGULATE ACTIVITY; PREDICTION ERRORS; DECISION-MAKING; SELF-REFLECTION; RISK; CHOICE; CORTEX; UNCERTAINTY

    Abstract: To support reward-based decision-making, the brain must encode potential outcomes both in terms of their incentive value and their probability of occurrence. Recent research has made it clear that the brain bears multiple representations of reward magnitude, meaning that a single choice option may be represented differently-and even inconsistently-in different brain areas. There are some hints that the same may be true for reward probability. Preliminary evidence hints that, even as systematic distortions of probability are expressed in behavior, these may not always be uniformly reflected at the neural level: Some neural representations of probability may be immune from such distortions. This study provides new evidence consistent with this possibility. Participants in a behavioral experiment displayed a classic "illusion of control," providing higher estimates of reward probability for gambles they had chosen than for identical gambles that were imposed on them. However, an fMRI study of the same task revealed that neural prediction error signals, arising when gamble outcomes were revealed, were unaffected by the illusion of control. The resulting behavioral-neural dissociation reinforces the case for multiple, inconsistent internal representations of reward probability, while also prompting a reinterpretation of the illusion of control effect itself.

    Cate of OECD: Basic medicine

    Year of Publication: 2013

    Business Area: gamble

    Detail Business: gamble

    Country: USA

    Study Area:

    Name of Journal: JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: [Kool, Wouter; Getz, Sarah J.; Botvinick, Matthew M.] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA

    Press Adress: Kool, W (reprint author), Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.

    Email Address:

    Citaion:

    Funding: James S. McDonnell Foundation

    Lists of Citation: Abler B, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V31, P790, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.001; Allais P. M., 1953, ECONOMETRICA, V21, P503; Bernoulli D, 1954, ECONOMETRICA, V22, P23, DOI 10.2307/1909829; Berns GS, 2008, NEUROIMAGE, V39, P2047, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.028; Bown NJ, 2003, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V16, P297, DOI 10.1002/bdm.447; Brainard DH, 1997, SPATIAL VISION, V10, P433, DOI 10.1163/156856897X00357; Browning M, 2012, NEUROIMAGE, V59, P1942, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.007; Clark L, 2009, NEURON, V61, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.031; Cox RW, 1996, COMPUT BIOMED RES, V29, P162, DOI 10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014; Daw ND, 2005, NAT NEUROSCI, V8, P1704, DOI 10.1038/nn1560; De Martino B, 2009, J NEUROSCI, V29, P3833, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4832-08.2009; Fiorillo CD, 2003, SCIENCE, V299, P1898, DOI 10.1126/science.1077349; FitzGerald THB, 2010, CURR BIOL, V20, P1823, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.048; Fossati P, 2003, AM J PSYCHIAT, V160, P1938, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.11.1938; Hayden BY, 2011, J NEUROSCI, V31, P4178, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4652-10.2011; Hertwig R, 2009, TRENDS COGN SCI, V13, P517, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004; Hertwig R, 2004, PSYCHOL SCI, V15, P534, DOI 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x; Hsu M, 2009, J NEUROSCI, V29, P2231, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5296-08.2009; Huettel SA, 2006, NEURON, V49, P765, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.024; Hutcherson CA, 2012, J NEUROSCI, V32, P13543, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6387-11.2012; ISEN AM, 1987, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V39, P145, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(87)90034-3; ISEN AM, 1983, ORGAN BEHAV HUM PERF, V31, P194, DOI 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90120-4; Jessup RK, 2011, J NEUROSCI, V31, P6296, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6421-10.2011; Johnson MK, 2006, SOC COGN AFFECT NEUR, V1, P56, DOI 10.1093/scan/nsl004; Johnson SC, 2002, BRAIN, V125, P1808, DOI 10.1093/brain/awf181; KAHNEMAN D, 1990, J POLIT ECON, V98, P1325, DOI 10.1086/261737; KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185; Kobayashi S, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V87, P1488, DOI 10.1152/jn.00472.2001; LANGER EJ, 1975, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V32, P311, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.32.2.311; LANGER EJ, 1976, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V34, P191, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.34.2.191; Leotti LA, 2010, TRENDS COGN SCI, V14, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001; Leotti LA, 2011, PSYCHOL SCI, V22, P1310, DOI 10.1177/0956797611417005; Litt A, 2011, CEREB CORTEX, V21, P95, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhq065; McClure SM, 2007, J NEUROSCI, V27, P5796, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4246-06.2007; Montague PR, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P1936; Ochsner KN, 2005, NEUROIMAGE, V28, P797, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.069; Padoa-Schioppa C, 2006, NATURE, V441, P223, DOI 10.1038/nature04676; Paulus MP, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V30, P668, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.061; Pelli DG, 1997, SPATIAL VISION, V10, P437, DOI 10.1163/156856897X00366; Platt ML, 1999, NATURE, V400, P233, DOI 10.1038/22268; Presson PK, 1996, J SOC BEHAV PERS, V11, P493; Preuschoff K, 2008, J NEUROSCI, V28, P2745, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4286-07.2008; Rangel A, 2010, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V20, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.conb.2010.03.001; Rescorla RA, 1972, CLASSICAL CONDITION, P64, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.COGPSYCH.2004.11.001; Roesch MR, 2009, J NEUROSCI, V29, P13365, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2572-09.2009; Schultz W, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P1593, DOI 10.1126/science.275.5306.1593; Simon DA, 2011, J NEUROSCI, V31, P5526, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4647-10.2011; Starmer C, 2000, J ECON LIT, V38, P332, DOI 10.1257/jel.38.2.332; Sutton R., 1998, REINFORCEMENT LEARNI; Talairach J., 1988, COPLANAR STEREOTAXIC; Thompson SC, 1998, PSYCHOL BULL, V123, P143, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.143; Tobler PN, 2008, J NEUROSCI, V28, P11703, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2870-08.2008; Trepel C, 2005, COGNITIVE BRAIN RES, V23, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.016; TVERSKY A, 1992, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V5, P297, DOI 10.1007/BF00122574; von Neumann J., 1944, THEORY GAMES EC BEHA; Vul E, 2010, FDN ISSUES HUMAN BRA, P71

    Number of Citaion: 56

    Publication: MIT PRESS

    City of Publication: CAMBRIDGE

    Address of Publication: 55 HAYWARD STREET, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA

    ISSN: 0898-929X

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI

    ISO Source Abbreviation: J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    Volume: 25

    Version: 6

    Start of File: 852

    End of File: 861

    DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00369

    Number of Pages: 10

    Web of Science Category: Neurosciences; Psychology, Experimental

    Subject Category: Neurosciences & Neurology; Psychology

    Document Delivery Number: 136IG

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000318355000005

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 14:56:52 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next