학제간연구 | Interdisciplinary Studies in Gambling | 跨学科研究
- date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 1913
-
- Article] Acute Stress Modulates Feedback Processing in Men and Women: Differential Effects on the Feedback-Related Negativity and Theta and Beta Power
-
DocNo of ILP: 42
Doc. Type: Article
Title: Acute Stress Modulates Feedback Processing in Men and Women: Differential Effects on the Feedback-Related Negativity and Theta and Beta Power
Authors: Banis, S; Geerligs, L; Lorist, MM
Full Name of Authors: Banis, Stella; Geerligs, Linda; Lorist, Monicque M.
Keywords by Author:
Keywords Plus: MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; DECISION-MAKING; OSCILLATORY ACTIVITY; ANTICIPATORY STRESS; COGNITIVE CONTROL; BRAIN POTENTIALS; PHASE SYNCHRONY; GAMBLING TASK; REWARD; DEPRESSION
Abstract: Sex-specific prevalence rates in mental and physical disorders may be partly explained by sex differences in physiological stress responses. Neural networks that might be involved are those underlying feedback processing. Aim of the present EEG study was to investigate whether acute stress alters feedback processing, and whether stress effects differ between men and women. Male and female participants performed a gambling task, in a control and a stress condition. Stress was induced by exposing participants to a noise stressor. Brain activity was analyzed using both event-related potential and time-frequency analyses, measuring the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and feedback-related changes in theta and beta oscillatory power, respectively. While the FRN and feedback-related theta power were similarly affected by stress induction in both sexes, feedback-related beta power depended on the combination of stress induction condition and sex. FRN amplitude and theta power increases were smaller in the stress relative to the control condition in both sexes, demonstrating that acute noise stress impairs performance monitoring irrespective of sex. However, in the stress but not in the control condition, early lower beta-band power increases were larger for men than women, indicating that stress effects on feedback processing are partly sex-dependent. Our findings suggest that sex-specific effects on feedback processing may comprise a factor underlying sex-specific stress responses.
Cate of OECD: Other natural sciences
Year of Publication: 2014
Business Area: gamble
Detail Business: gamble
Country: USA
Study Area:
Name of Journal: PLOS ONE
Language: English
Country of Authors: [Banis, Stella; Geerligs, Linda; Lorist, Monicque M.] Univ Groningen, Dept Expt Psychol, Groningen, Netherlands; [Geerligs, Linda; Lorist, Monicque M.] Univ Groningen, BCN Neuroimaging Ctr, Groningen, Netherlands
Press Adress: Lorist, MM (reprint author), Univ Groningen, Dept Expt Psychol, Groningen, Netherlands.
Email Address: m.m.lorist@rug.nl
Citaion:
Funding: NWO grant [400-07-001]
Lists of Citation: Arnsten AFT, 1998, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V55, P362, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.55.4.362; Babisch W, 2003, Noise Health, V5, P1; Baker SN, 2007, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V17, P649, DOI [10.1016/j.conb.2008.01.007, 10.1016/i.conb.2008.01.007]; Banis S, 2012, BIOL PSYCHOL, V91, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.06.009; Bogdan R, 2006, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V60, P1147, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.037; Botvinick MM, 2007, COGN AFFECT BEHAV NE, V7, P356, DOI 10.3758/CABN.7.4.356; Botvinick MM, 2004, TRENDS COGN SCI, V8, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003; Cavanagh JF, 2010, NEUROIMAGE, V49, P3198, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.080; Cavanagh JF, 2012, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V49, P220, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01293.x; Cavanagh JF, 2011, SOC COGN AFFECT NEUR, V6, P311, DOI 10.1093/scan/nsq041; Cavanagh JF, 2009, J NEUROSCI, V29, P98, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4137-08.2009; Cohen MX, 2009, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V21, P390, DOI 10.1162/jocn.2008.21020; Cohen MX, 2011, TRENDS COGN SCI, V15, P558, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.004; Cohen MX, 2007, NEUROIMAGE, V35, P968, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.056; Dedovic K, 2009, CAN J PSYCHIAT, V54, P6; Luft CD, 2013, J NEUROSCI, V33, P2029, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2565-12.2013; Engel AK, 2010, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V20, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015; Forbes EE, 2007, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V61, P633, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.026; Foti D, 2009, BIOL PSYCHOL, V81, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.12.004; Gehring WJ, 2002, SCIENCE, V295, P2279, DOI 10.1126/science.1066893; Goyer JP, 2008, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V20, P2058, DOI 10.1162/jocn.2008.20134; Grandchamp R, 2011, FRONT PSYCHOL, V2, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00236; Gratton G., 1983, ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAP, V5, P468, DOI DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9; HajiHosseini A, 2012, NEUROIMAGE, V60, P1678, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.125; Hampson E, 2008, SEX DIFFERENCES BRAI, P63; Holroyd CB, 2003, NEUROREPORT, V14, P2481, DOI 10.1097/01.wnr.0000099601/41403.a5; Holroyd CB, 2002, PSYCHOL REV, V109, P679, DOI 10.1037//0033-295X.109.4.679; Kajantie E, 2006, PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINO, V31, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.07.002; Kayser J, 2006, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V117, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.034; Kirschbaum C, 1999, PSYCHOSOM MED, V61, P154; Kudielka BM, 2009, PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINO, V34, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.004; Lachaux JP, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P194, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<194::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-C; Lighthall NR, 2012, SOC COGN AFFECT NEUR, V7, P476, DOI 10.1093/scan/nsr026; Lighthall NR, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006002; Luck S.J, 2005, INTRO EVENT RELATED; Luque D, 2012, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V24, P794, DOI 10.1162/jocn_a_00145; Marco-Pallares J, 2008, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V46, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.016; Miltner WHR, 1997, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V9, P788, DOI 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.788; Nieuwenhuis S, 2004, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V28, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.05.003; Oostenveld R, 2011, COMPUT INTEL NEUROSC, DOI 10.1155/2011/156869; Ossewaarde L, 2010, PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINO, V35, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.08.011; Ossewaarde L, 2011, SOC COGN AFFECT NEUR, V6, P612, DOI 10.1093/scan/nsq071; Ossewaarde L, 2011, NEUROIMAGE, V55, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.068; Petzold A, 2010, BEHAV NEUROSCI, V124, P248, DOI 10.1037/a0018930; Platt ML, 2008, NAT NEUROSCI, V11, P398, DOI 10.1038/nn2062; Polich J, 2007, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V118, P2128, DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019; Porcelli Anthony J, 2012, Front Neurosci, V6, P157, DOI 10.3389/fnins.2012.00157; Porcelli AJ, 2009, PSYCHOL SCI, V20, P278, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02288.x; Preston SD, 2007, BEHAV NEUROSCI, V121, P257, DOI 10.1037/0735-7044.121.2.257; Ridderinkhof KR, 2004, SCIENCE, V306, P443, DOI 10.1126/science.1100301; Russo SJ, 2013, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V14, P609, DOI 10.1038/nrn3381; Starcke K, 2012, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V36, P1228, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.003; Starcke K, 2008, BEHAV NEUROSCI, V122, P1352, DOI 10.1037/a0013281; Steele JD, 2007, BRAIN, V130, P2367, DOI 10.1093/brain/awm150; Szalma JL, 2011, PSYCHOL BULL, V137, P682, DOI 10.1037/a0023987; Tucker DM, 2003, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V112, P667, DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.667; van de Vijver I, 2011, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V23, P4106, DOI 10.1162/jocn_a_00110; van den Bos R, 2009, PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINO, V34, P1449, DOI 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.016; Wald FD, 1990, NED T PSYCHOL, V45, P86; Wang JJ, 2007, SOC COGN AFFECT NEUR, V2, P227, DOI 10.1093/scan/nsm018; Wu Y, 2009, BRAIN RES, V1286, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.032; Yeung N, 2004, J NEUROSCI, V24, P6258, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4537-03.2004
Number of Citaion: 62
Publication: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
City of Publication: SAN FRANCISCO
Address of Publication: 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
ISSN: 1932-6203
29-Character Source Abbreviation: PLOS ONE
ISO Source Abbreviation: PLoS One
Volume: 9
Version: 4
Start of File:
End of File:
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095690
Number of Pages: 17
Web of Science Category: Multidisciplinary Sciences
Subject Category: Science & Technology - Other Topics
Document Delivery Number: AG2IS
Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000335240300073
- reply : 0
-
- list
-
- prev
- next