Ä«Áö³ë | Cases & Studies in Casino | 赌场
- Article] Attitudes Toward Smoke-Free Workplaces, Restaurants, and Bars, Casinos, and Clubs Among US Adults: Findings From the 2009-2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey
-
DocNo of ILP: 525
Doc. Type: Article
Title: Attitudes Toward Smoke-Free Workplaces, Restaurants, and Bars, Casinos, and Clubs Among US Adults: Findings From the 2009-2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey
Authors: King, BA; Dube, SR; Tynan, MA
Full Name of Authors: King, Brian A.; Dube, Shanta R.; Tynan, Michael A.
Keywords by Author:
Keywords Plus: UNITED-STATES; FREE POLICIES; LEGISLATION; SUPPORT
Abstract: Introduction: An increasing number of U.S. states and communities have implemented smoke-free policies prohibiting smoking in all indoor workplaces and public areas. Public attitudes toward smoke-free environments are an evidenced-based, key indicator for the successful implementation and enforcement of smoke-free policies. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2009-2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey, a landline and cell phone survey of adults aged years old residing in the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. The overall proportion of respondents who reported that smoking should "never be allowed" in workplaces, restaurants, and bars/casinos/clubs was calculated, both nationally and by state. National estimates were also calculated by sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, annual household income, sexual orientation, and smoking status. Results: Nationally, 81.6% of U.S. adults think workplaces should be smoke-free (state range: 68.6% [Kentucky] to 89.1% [California]); 74.9% think restaurants should be smoke-free (state range: 59.5% [Missouri] to 84.6% [California]); 50.0% think bars/casinos/clubs should be smoke-free (state range: 32.3% [Nevada] to 61.3% [Maine]); and 47.5% think workplaces, restaurants, and bars/casinos/clubs should be smoke-free (state range: 30.3% [Nevada] to 58.8% [Maine]). Regardless of venue type, women, older individuals, non-Hispanic Asians, individuals with higher education and income, and nonsmokers were the most likely to think these environments should be smoke-free. Conclusions: A majority of U.S. adults think workplaces and restaurants should be smoke-free, while half think bars, casinos, and clubs should be smoke-free. Continued efforts are needed to educate the public about the dangers of secondhand smoke and the benefits of smoke-free indoor environments.
Cate of OECD: Health sciences
Year of Publication: 2013
Business Area: casino
Detail Business: casino
Country: England
Study Area: regulation, legislation, sales, restaurant, interview, interview, terminal, mobile, older, attitude, smoke
Name of Journal: NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
Language: English
Country of Authors: [King, Brian A.; Dube, Shanta R.; Tynan, Michael A.] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Off Smoking & Hlth, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA; [King, Brian A.] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Epidem Intelligence Serv, Div Appl Sci, Sci Educ & Profess Dev Program Off, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
Press Adress: King, BA (reprint author), Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Off Smoking & Hlth, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, 4770 Buford Highway,MS K-50, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA.
Email Address: baking@cdc.gov
Citaion:
Funding:
Lists of Citation: American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation, 2012, SUMM 100 SMOK STAT L; Borland R, 2006, TOB CONTROL, V15, P42, DOI 10.1136/tc.2005.012492; CASRO, 2009, COD STAND ETH SURV R; CDC, 2012, STAT TOB ACT TRACK E; King Brian, 2011, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V60, P1207; Tynan M., 2011, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V60, P472; DHHS, 2006, HLTH CONS INV EXP TO; DHHS, 2010, TOB SMOK CAUS DIS BI; Fong GT, 2006, TOB CONTROL, V15, P51, DOI 10.1136/tc.2005.013649; Hahn EJ, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V39, pS66, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.013; Institute of Medicine, 2009, SEC SMOK EXP CARD EF; King Brian A, 2012, Am J Public Health, V102, pe93, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301002; Maguire Rachel Loflin, 2010, N C Med J, V71, P511; Osypuk TL, 2010, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V100, P171, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160218; Rose JE, 2004, NICOTINE TOB RES, V6, P133, DOI 10.1080/14622200310001656957; Scollo M, 2003, TOB CONTROL, V12, P13, DOI 10.1136/tc.12.1.13; Starr G., 2005, KEY OUTCOME INDICATO; Tang H, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P611, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.4.611; U.S. Census Bureau, 2011, 2005 2009 ACS 5 YEAR
Number of Citaion: 19
Publication: OXFORD UNIV PRESS
City of Publication: OXFORD
Address of Publication: GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
ISSN: 1462-2203
29-Character Source Abbreviation: NICOTINE TOB RES
ISO Source Abbreviation: Nicotine Tob. Res.
Volume: 15
Version: 8
Start of File: 1464
End of File: 1470
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts342
Number of Pages: 7
Web of Science Category: Substance Abuse; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Subject Category: Substance Abuse; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Document Delivery Number: 187CF
Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000322093700017
[ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 14:19:01 GAMBLING¿¡¼ À̵¿ µÊ]
- reply : 0
-
- list
-
- prev
- next